Wednesday, June 13, 2007

History is Repeating Itself

Throughout history, the populous of Rhode Island has fought for what it believes in despite its small size. Pioneers such as Roger Williams originated the colony based on the undeniably American principles of free religion. However, feats like this were not accomplished at the hand of one person. Only together, as a unified state, were their philosophy and culture able to persevere and flourish. In the same vein, only as a unified constituency will we achieve our goals.

Across the world, PBGR systems have failed to hit their mark. At Beacon School in Manhattan, they believed they had finally solved their problem of how to best asses their students. They instigated the portfolio system. Like many other schools, their beginning was a struggle to perfect their system, but eventually worked into a pattern which allowed the portfolio system to succeed, for a time.

This success, however, did not last long for troubles soon came to their students. Students had trouble managing their school work, studying for their regents exam - one of the toughest of its kind - and attempting to complete their portfolio. Beacon's students only experienced stress and frustrations. Not only were they required to pass their classes and receive the necessary amount of credits to graduate, but they also had to pass a statewide standardized test and complete their portfolio.

Many faculty, educators, and students at Beacon School and other schools throughout the nation find the system to be “very time consuming” and "Officials object to using portfolios for assessment because they are too subjective". Depending on a given teacher’s standards, a student could pass the assignment with one teacher, and fail it with another.

Our state education department claims that the diploma system has a valid purpose, but I disagree. On the contrary, the system is invalid. The history, the facts, and our very own school’s experience collectively contradict this supposition. We cannot allow our government to control us. We cannot lower ourselves to becoming nothing but wet tar ready to be steamrolled by an authoritarian power.

We must stop the injustice. We must accelerate our campaign against this unnecessary hindrance to our graduation. All it has caused for students is frustration and turmoil. The system itself may slowly improve, but not in a manner great enough to suit our student body, or our state. We must become an impetus for the entire state; the impetus for the change we so dearly need. No person by themselves can change the system, but together, as a student body, we can accomplish any feat. So it’s up to you to join the cause in making our education a more sensible and less frustrating system than it already is. After all, it is our education…

3 comments:

Sarah J said...

I'm surprised they would use a portfolio system in New York. I had always assumed that Regents were used to show proficiency; I'm pretty sure if you fail them, you don't have to retake the class, but you have to take the Regent test again for it [the class] until you pass.

TJC said...

Keep in mind, this was not a statewide program. It was a school-specific implementation.

spectacular said...

Hm. I read the article and I guess their program failed the way ours may ultimately fail, because of a lack of time. Though, their portfolio system was much different than ours and the reasons for a lack of time are different.